如何分析與理性審慎看待美國商務(wù)部擴(kuò)大涉中的最終軍事用途及最終軍事用戶的限制以及有關(guān)“最終軍事用戶清單”的新聞?
尾注:
[1] 見
https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/pdfs/2566-2020-meu-faq/file
及May_2020_Trade_Bulletin.pdf (uscc.gov)
[2] “The Trump administration is close to declaring that 89 Chinese aerospace and other companies have military ties, restricting them from buying a range of U.S. goods and technology, according to a draft copy of the list seen by Reuters. The list is included in a draft rule that identifies Chinese and Russian companies the U.S. considers “military end users,” a designation that means U.S. suppliers must seek licenses to sell a broad swath of commercially available items to them.” 見https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-china-military-companies/exclusive-in-latest-china-jab-us-drafts-list-of-89-firms-with-military-ties-idUSKBN28307Z
[3] 《瓦森納協(xié)定》又稱瓦森納安排機(jī)制,1996年簽署設(shè)立,全稱為《關(guān)于常規(guī)武器和兩用物品及技術(shù)出口控制的瓦森納協(xié)定》,
The Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies.
[4] 見
https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/pdfs/2566-2020-meu-faq/file
[5] 見
https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/pdfs/2566-2020-meu-faq/file
[6] “The Trump administration is close to declaring that 89 Chinese aerospace and other companies have military ties, restricting them from buying a range of U.S. goods and technology, according to a draft copy of the list seen by Reuters. The list is included in a draft rule that identifies Chinese and Russian companies the U.S. considers “military end users,” a designation that means U.S. suppliers must seek licenses to sell a broad swath of commercially available items to them.” 見https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-china-military-companies/exclusive-in-latest-china-jab-us-drafts-list-of-89-firms-with-military-ties-idUSKBN28307Z
[7] “The Trump administration is close to declaring that 89 Chinese aerospace and other companies have military ties, restricting them from buying a range of U.S. goods and technology, according to a draft copy of the list seen by Reuters. The list is included in a draft rule that identifies Chinese and Russian companies the U.S. considers “military end users,” a designation that means U.S. suppliers must seek licenses to sell a broad swath of commercially available items to them.” 見https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-china-military-companies/exclusive-in-latest-china-jab-us-drafts-list-of-89-firms-with-military-ties-idUSKBN28307Z
[8] 見
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-addressing-threat-securities-investments-finance-communist-chinese-military-companies/
[9] 見DOD Releases List of Additional Companies, in Accordance with Section 1237 of FY19 NDAA,https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/Article/2328894/dod-releases-list-of-additional-companies-in-accordance-with-section-1237-of-fy/
[10] 見
https://media.defense.gov/2020/Aug/28/2002486659/-1/-1/1/LINK_2_1237_TRANCHE_1_QUALIFIYING_ENTITIES.PDF
轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明來自浙江中液機(jī)械設(shè)備有限公司 ,本文標(biāo)題:《如何分析與理性審慎看待美國商務(wù)部擴(kuò)大涉中的最終軍事用途及最終軍事用戶的限制以及有關(guān)“最終軍事用戶清單”的新聞?》
還沒有評(píng)論,來說兩句吧...